Miro

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

I've used it for everything from wireframe design to final layouts and prototypes. You may also use it to showcase your work by using interactive mockups. I've been in the InVision environment for a long time and have been solving numerous challenges at work; the development design with the aid of InVision has led to me producing good outcomes for constructing a website and prototype. He became an active member of the community thanks to synchronization with other applications.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It's a well-organized and safe design software and InVision prototype is great. It's really simple to link displays, create multiple screen states, and the animations are typically smooth. You have a lot of say in how you offer the prototype to different individuals. Its InVision creative suite integration tools are the app's greatest features. One of the most significant visualization advances is the use of new layouts and templates for prototyping. You may also create prototypes of InVision mockups and designs.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Although it is a fantastic tool, because it is a diverse software, it must be combined with a plethora of different plugins, which I dislike. InVision crashes regularly, making collaboration with numerous designers difficult. There's also the bother of continuously updating the share link - only the file's owner can update the link, which may be extremely inconvenient when testing and needing to correct a minor fault.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

InVision is simple to use and you will quickly become accustomed to the UI. It is also comparable to other design tools such as Figma, Sketch, and others, making it simple for users to switch applications. A four-week intensive training will provide a novice with a reasonable degree of comprehension. It's fantastic if you're not working with enormous files and/or need to utilize them to display animation and UI talents. However, if you need to work with numerous designers or have a huge design file, InVision may not be for you.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

We were seeking for a low-cost design prototyping solution for our small team. The advantages have included an easy method to display designs to stakeholders, a wonderful portable mode for developers, and an extraordinary ability to do unmoderated user testing from within InVision. The biggest advantage I see in adopting InVision is that anyone who is not a designer (project manager, for example) can quickly construct a mockup from the photographs, which is a great concept.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

The experience of watching is fantastic. Its vibrant color pallet adds to the product's appeal. The main and finest feature is the picture upload option. The program itself is fantastic, and I really like the user testing feature. InVision is typically intuitive and inventive in terms of design for my team. As viewers, our stakeholders had no issues with the tool. It's exciting to see InVision continue to develop.

What do you dislike most about this product?

I believe the product's architecture and design distinguish it from its market competitors. It is also an important role in user conversion rate because other users are accustomed to the standard layout for UI UX design. However, there doesn't appear to be a method to preview a user test without producing a result. However, this is readily remedied with the ability to erase your "fake" result.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

A lot is going on in the world of content production software. It is critical to examine competing software in the same domain. This is an excellent solution if you need a simple tool to organize design prototypes. It's also a nice substitute for Marvel if you want to save money on tools.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

We like to utilize it for user research: instead of employing complex tools for analysis, we want to keep things simple. Miro enables us to show several concepts on a single board. The photographs do not have to be closely related or put in a certain order. All schematics are free to be inspected, debated, updated, and expanded upon. Tracking changes on one dashboard is significantly easier with Miro than tracking updates to several papers.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I enjoy the group meeting aspects such as voting with music, Miro invites you to express yourself visually, we communicate concepts with words by default written and verbal. When attempting to reduce uncertainty from a somewhat well-understood issue, words can be useful. A visual image/representation, on the other hand, may be more helpful in the early phases of a concept brainstorming. Very swiftly conveys the substance of an idea, request that the viewer explain the subject in their own terms. It does not bombard the viewer with unnecessary information, Miro permits him to utilize words but he adds the most value when he limits their use.

What do you dislike most about this product?

When there are really large tables, things can become a little slow, although this does not happen very often. I'd also like it if you could make a 'espejo' mark that could be placed on other tables and updated'magically' on other tables. Comments/retroalimentación throughout the creation process are not always useful. They have the potential to stall the creative process and turn it into an error-correction exercise. There may be a function that allows you to disable this "movement-tracker".

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Establish and implement a proper organizational system from the start if you are a huge organization. It is not intended to replace other products you may be using, such as word processors, spreadsheets, and presentations. However, it is a highly efficient technique to summarize topics that may be scattered over several publications and bring them together in one location.