Miro

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

Teamwork is far too simple to manage now that I use Miro. It transformed how we shared documents, images, sketches, and ideas. It functions similarly to a traditional whiteboard, with the added benefit of real-time collaboration.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Miro is fantastic, and I use it daily to help me organize my thoughts. Miro's simplicity is my favorite feature. It assists me in everything from strategic planning, project management, mind mapping, and workflows. I like teams that can collaborate on a single board, adding comments and building together. Miro allows teams to easily move, delete, and add objects and texts.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The history of changes is difficult to track e.g who did what and when, who put this element where? when? What contribution did teammates make? etc. What this tool does not provide is an actual meeting call/video for that, we must use other means of communication.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Best software to arrange webinars. We have mostly used it as a brainstorming tool since we first started using it. The design of Miro is based on intuition and teamwork. It can be used on any device without the need to install any additional software or plugins. A quick learner who can quickly engage a diverse group of people.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

We use InVision to build richer animations and prototypes for testing. I am in charge of building graphical interfaces for smartphone applications or website interfaces. It is also simple to prepare assets from InVision, such as color samples, typography, icon set, and characters.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It is straightforward and focused, but not at the price of significant features such as sophisticated animation transitions. I really appreciate how you can upload prototype URLs for various purposes, such as user testing, feedback, and so on, and choose whether changes are saved and published or just stored. It is also feasible to construct the drawing boards in Photoshop and then import the work into InVision to produce the real prototype, which can then be shared with the customer.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The process of connecting displays to construct a prototype is time-consuming. Furthermore, InVision does not automatically adjust to the screen size of the device on which the preview is presented; you must specify which portion of an artboard is visible, i.e. set a vertical breakpoint, and the width of the artboard will shrink or grow to match the device. Touch motions are also lacking. Otherwise, fantastic software.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Obviously, if you're thinking of switching to InVision (or any similar product) from something else, there will be a learning curve. InVision has showed a lot of potential in the previous several years and has developed into a great solution in this market, in my opinion. Personal experience has shown me that it is superior than Sketch in certain ways but lacking in others. It is now the best program for UI/UX design, and it can handle both the design and prototype phases.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

Initially I used it deliberately to design web and mobile interfaces, as well as associated interactive prototypes. Everything is much easier now that the streams have been included. I now use it for everything digital, including designs for Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn. The most difficult challenge that InVision solves for me is allowing a customer to stroll around a website or app. I am compelled to describe my conceptualizations to the customer and expect them to follow through effectively without the interactive choices that InVision provides. Instead of merely brainstorming with customers and hope they can follow through.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I enjoy how simple the program is, how well organized the materials are, and how frequently new features are added. The ability to collaborate in real time is fantastic. Because everything is supposed to be basic, the application is incredibly straightforward to use and experiment with to develop UI structures and mockups. I also enjoy how mockups can be made with interactive components to make them feel more like a working product. The nicest component of InVision is the program's prototyping feature, which allows me to lead my clients through my construct and clearly see the almost working concept.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Creating an actual prototype with interactions is quite difficult. It's not intuitive, and it takes a lot of time before and after multiple testing to get a successful prototype. I wouldn't say I like the interface testing phase. I would also suggest adding more touch gestures and the ability to import movies to make the prototype process more akin to the final product.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Immerse yourself in the program for a few weeks before planning a project around it. Youtube is a great place to learn some basic tips and tricks with InVision, as the program doesn't really show all of its features when you first use it. My suggestion would be to learn some of the nuances to fully use it to its fullest advantage, InVision is efficient for building mockups.