Splunk AppDynamics

What differentiates Splunk AppDynamics from other similar products?

It is quite easy to locate specific data and is not buried under a dozen other options. The bulk of the desired metric points is calculated and shown in the app right away. It's simple to configure, show, and notify on finer details. SaaS is superior to on-premise alternatives for large implementations. The on-premises version works well for smaller footprints.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

The alerting system is robust and has various criteria that can be defined for health rules. The support offers excellent service and is relatively quick to respond. The learning tools provided through their academy cover everything you might need to know with the device. Out-of-the-box data collection is easy and very comprehensive, with minimal configuration required.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The effort-to-value ratio is far higher than anticipated. Since each application is unique, it is challenging to develop patterns and cookies. - It's expensive and difficult to find skilled personnel who can utilize a product's full potential. Sometimes information in the documentation is inaccurate, especially regarding extensions that are not timely updated.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Logging, unique metrics, tracing, and metadata With all of that, you can see the big picture, track the inner call stack traces, and identify the primary issue. Additionally, you may monitor your application by creating dashboards based on custom metrics. We suggested it because the program is excellent.

What differentiates Splunk AppDynamics from other similar products?

AppDynamics is a fantastic product that keeps developing and adding features. It has multiple times given us the proactive alerts we needed to find a problem before it turned into a complete outage. For most instrumented applications, implementation was relatively simple and easy. A few less common application platforms required more work to implement effectively; however, help was provided to guarantee this was done.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Their popularity is due to their robust capabilities, platform architecture, and user-friendliness. Even though every tool has its quirks, AppDynamics tend to be less annoying and simpler to work around. We have rarely encountered a blocking issue that wasn't resolved in some way. The agent and end-user monitoring setup are quick and simple, and data input begins immediately.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The infrastructure includes some parts that don't come standard with high availability. Because of their extreme sensitivity to network problems, the controllers will initiate a HA failover at the tiniest network blip. The method for selecting the master node is quite flawed and frequently results in split-brain instances rather than clean failovers.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Excellent network map visualization of monitoring data on the user interface. Finding the bottlenecks and the areas where the program is running slowly is helpful. Gives detailed information to help in problem-solving. It doesn't use a lot of resources.AppDynamics gains from routine product updates, release cycles, and enhancements. AppDynamics is quite durable, and Cisco offers quick, effective support for the tool.

What differentiates Splunk AppDynamics from other similar products?

We are also trying to supervise the usage of all commercial transactions, including how long it would take to notify a particular API endpoint, using AppDynamics, which generates us with a truly united shot that erases several barriers to addressing key challenges.`

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Its flow charts are wonderful. The best part is everything is displayed in a chart and is easy to understand owing to the benchmark that we construct depending on multiple applications and demands that can be changed at any time in the hopes of living up to expectations.

What do you dislike most about this product?

It is deficient in advanced technologies that make use of numerous frameworks technologies and integrate with the other data streams. There are several menus and options to choose from, however most of the often you have no idea what they do. Because of the app's vastness, I would recommend to use only a tiny subset of its capabilities.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

It greatly aided in achieving the most important aim, thus I would strongly recommend it to anyone else. However, keep in mind exactly whatever you want considering putting additional capabilities after a transaction has been closed might be pricey. Attend lectures and/or schedule consultations; allocating employees to implementation and maintenance is also a smart idea.